Friday, February 27, 2009

U.S. Senate Votes to Uphold Second Amendment




Fairfax, Va. - The United States Senate has voted, with overwhelming bipartisan support, to adopt an amendment offered by Senator John Ensign (R-NV) that seeks to protect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens in the District of Columbia. The amendment, attached to S.160, the D.C. Voting Rights Act, will repeal restrictive gun control laws passed by the District of Columbia's (D.C.) city council after the landmark D.C. v. Heller Supreme Court decision. The vote margin was 62-36.

"Today's vote brings us one step closer to restoring the Second Amendment freedom of law-abiding D.C. residents," said NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox. "It's ludicrous that good people in our nation's capital continue to be harassed as they try to defend themselves and their loved ones in their own homes. This vote reinforces the historic Heller ruling."

After the Heller ruling, the D.C. city council passed a law requiring would-be gun owners to pay a registration fee, pass a 20-question multiple choice test, take a five-hour training course, undergo an invasive background check every six years, re-register any firearm every three years, and finally, submit all handguns for ballistics testing. Current D.C. law also bans an overwhelming majority of firearms commonly used for self-defense. This Ensign Amendment would also remedy that unjust practice.

"NRA would like to thank the lead sponsor, Sen. John Ensign for his efforts to reform D.C.'s gun laws and enable folks to protect their property and their loved ones," concluded Cox. "It's time for leaders in Washington to wake up to the fact that the Supreme Court decision is now the law of the land."

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Sunday Hunting Bill to be Considered Today


Today, Wednesday, February 25 the House Environmental Matters Committee will consider House Bill 663.

Sponsored as a bi-partisan bill, HB 663 would remove restrictions on a person’s ability to hunt deer on specified Sundays on private property in Baltimore County.

Sunday hunting has no detrimental effect on wildlife populations as those states permitting it have healthy and abundant wildlife. Many hunters - be it young or old, novice or experienced - stop hunting because of the lack of opportunity, both in time and accessible land. The addition of an extra day in the field increases a person’s available time to enjoy our hunting heritage. Sunday hunting will also bring a much-needed economic boost to rural areas. Every day that hunters are in the field, they spend money on gas, food, lodging and the dozens of other incidentals that go along with a day’s hunt. The ripple effect of this spending can have a major impact on a rural town or county. This legislation will clearly help advance and preserve Maryland’s rich hunting traditions.

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Maryland Pro-Gun Bills to be Heard Today



Two important pieces of pro-gun legislation will be heard on Tuesday, February 24 in the House Judiciary Committee.

House Bill 470 would repeal the requirement that the Secretary of State Police find that a person has a good and substantial reason to wear, carry, or transport a handgun before issuing a handgun permit. HB 470 is a bi-partisan bill that will ensure Maryland citizens are afforded the right to self-defense enjoyed by citizens in 40 other states.

House Bill 682 would require that the Secretary of State Police issue a permit to carry, wear, or transport a handgun within a reasonable time to a person who has successfully completed the Federal Flight Deck Officer Program of the Transportation Security Administration.

Saturday, February 21, 2009

Cave House For Sale



For those interested in owning a house/cave in Missouri, place your bids now!

Pending Arrest in the Chandra Levy Murder?


According to various media outlets, DC Metropolitan Police are seeking an arrest warrant in connection with the murder of Chandra Levy. Apparently, police will charge an inmate convicted of attacking two female joggers in the same Washington park where Levy's remains were found in 2002.

Sadly, when I think of Ms. Levy, I often remember former Congressman Gary Condit. While I never suspected him of the murder, it disgusted me that a married 53 year old man choose to woo a single lady 30 years his junior. I remember his lame denials of the affair. Then, when the pressure came on, the guy finally fessed up. Ultimately, his own party expelled him in the primary.

Clearly, Mr. Condit lacked any motive to lie to police and his constituents back in 2001-2002. Why then did he continually take an evasive and combative stance that ultimately cost him his political career?

Council seeks answers from Police Chief


Apparently, some members of the County Council share some of my concerns regarding the 911 call involving John Leopold. This week, Republican James Middlebrooks and Democrat Jamie Benoit publicly questioned the police department's handling of the situation. Therefore, they have requested that Chief James Teare be summoned to give a public explanation of the incident.

Middlebrooks explains he has two important questions. First he asks, "I would like this body to have the chief of police come before us to say what the procedures are when they suspect activity in parking lots?". Next he questions, "Is there a different standard for government officials?"

In his statement, Benoit opined, "It's a question of consistent police practice, and I think they're fair questions to be answered". He further stated, "I think it's imperative to maintain their credibility as a law enforcement agency that they treat everyone equally."

Personally, I think the answers here are obvious. On a complaint such as this, police have the duty to fully investigate the matter. Simply walking up and immediately dismissing the case as "unfounded" shows an egregious lack of judgment on the officer's part.

After all, in cases such as this, one party could turn out to be a kidnap or rape victim. Likewise, either could potentially have an outstanding arrest warrant. Of course, I am confident neither applied in January incident at Annapolis Mall. Still, the fact that both weren't separated, identified and questioned underlies the high likelihood that County Executive received some form of preferential treatment.

If there's some other explanation, I would love to hear James Teare's spin. Actually, all of us deserve to hear an official statement on this matter. And, since Leopold's spokesman has suggested a private meeting, I think that speaks volumes as to why the Chief should be under oath when he finally appears before the Council.

Friday, February 20, 2009

Police Twart Arson Attempt at Jumper's Theatre



On February 20, 2009, at approximately 0034 hours, officers from the Eastern District responded to the Jumpers Cinema at 8120 Jumpers Hole Road in Pasadena for a report of suspicious subjects tampering with doors.

Upon arrival, officers were approached by a citizen, who directed them to a vehicle that was seen driving away from the cinema. Corporal Scott Macallair conducted a traffic stop on Route 2 northbound near Jumpers Hole Road and the three occupants were detained. Simultaneously, Officer William Hughes, Officer John Gerczak, Officer Stephen Johnson and K- 9 officers Paul White and Kevin Mont arrived at the cinema and encountered four subjects walking away from the building. A fifth subject appeared from the side of the cinema carrying a gas container. All five subjects were detained and officers then began searching the building after discovering an open door. The officers then detected the odor of smoke and gasoline and saw that
a portion of the building’s interior was burning. All of the officers utilized their portable fire extinguishers to extinguish the blaze before it got out of control. All suspects were detained pending an investigation.

A joint investigation was conducted by Eastern District Patrol Officers from Platoon 4, the Fire Investigation Bureau of the Anne Arundel County Fire Department and the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. At this time, the Anne Arundel County Police Department is serving as the lead agency in this investigation, but support is being received from the Anne Arundel County Fire Department and the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
.
The investigation revealed that former employees of the cinema, Steven Fiataugaluia and Sandra Malott, along with another individual, Andrew Griffith, all formulated a plan to commit arson using a flammable liquid to ignite the cinema. The original plan called for the cinema to be burned on Friday the 13th. Several other suspects were involved in this incident. The investigation also revealed a ninth suspect was involved, but had fled the scene. He turned himself into the Anne Arundel County Police Department later that morning. The following nine suspects were charged with 2nd Degree Arson and 2nd Degree Burglary:

Steven Lino Fiataugaluia, 20, of 118 ½ Baltimore Ave., SW, Glen Burnie, MD.
Ahmed Ghani, 21, of 15055 Cedar Brook Pl., Hughesville, MD.
Sandra Elizabeth Malott, 20, of 302 Aquahart Rd., Glen Burnie, MD.
Andrew Griffith, 19, of 14 Hollins Ferry Rd., Ferndale, MD.
Ryan Paul Moore, 18, of 13 Woodland Dr., Severna Park, MD.
Emily Renee Ledford, 20, of 8419 Elvaton Rd., Glen Burnie, MD.
Walter Wilhelm Beatty 2nd , 23, of 7792 Moonfall Ct., Pasadena, MD.
Adam Lawson Beatty, 20, 401 Rose Ave., Glen Burnie, MD.
Julie Shrout, 24, of 7735 Glen Ave., Pasadena, MD.
Andrew Griffith was additionally charged with 4th Degree Burglary and Possession of a Fraudulent Government Identification.

From $700,000 in Savings, to $10/hour

Rosapepe and Pipkin Propose Re-Regulation


In a commendable bi-partisan effort, a Democratic and Republican Senator have teamed up in an effort to re-regulate Maryland electricity markets. Specifically, Sen. E.J. Pipkin and Sen. Jim Rosapepe are sponsoring the Maryland Electricity Reregulation and Energy Independence Act of 2009. After listening to fools like Andy Harris, Martin O'Malley and Bob Ehrlich standing up for BGE, it's refreshing to know we still have leaders who recognize electrical deregulation as one of the biggest public policy disasters in the history of this state.

Meanwhile, Constellation Energy has the audacity to ask for another rate increase. While most people are experiencing record high electric bills in the midst of a tough economy, these creeps feel as though they deserve an even larger portion of people's income. I guess Constellation Executives feel as though these circumstances shouldn't preclude them from collecting their generous yearly bonuses.

Make no mistake, people have grown weary of this "free market" scam. Sure, the term sounds all desirable and sexy. In reality, it's a costly endeavor that makes Executives rich and and leaves consumers screwed.

The Talk of the Arundel Center Today


There was a major buzz going around the Arundel Center throughout the day. No, it wasn't about secret meetings or the possibility of people testifying under oath. Instead, people were welcoming Erik Robey into the 30 and over club. Like him or not, Erik is an intelligent and hard working guy that tirelessly devotes himself to his job as Director of Community Services.

Happy Birthday, Mr. Robey. If I ever get a chance to pull you aside, I want to know how you've managed to avoid any gray hairs so far. Most of us started experiencing them in our mid-twenties!

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Maryland Pro-Gun Bill to be Heard in Committee



The House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to hear House Bill 359 on Thursday, February 19 at 1:00 p.m.

HB359, introduced by State Delegates Tony McConkey (R-33A), Jill Carter (D-41), Benjamin Kramer (D-19), Susan McComas (R-35B), and Kriselda Valderrama (D-26), would allow an eligible citizen who has had a temporary or final protective order issued on their behalf to be issued a concealed handgun permit by the Secretary of State Police.

This is a step in the right direction toward ensuring that all law-abiding Marylanders can exercise the Right-to-Carry for self-defense.

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Who Are The Candidates For AA County Executive?


Until last week, when it came to the topic of challengers for the 2010 County Executive race, many privately questioned the wisdom of wasting resources going against an incumbent apparently made of Teflon. Now, the dynamics have obviously changed. While the County Executive tries to demand the stories about him cease, others have envisioned a perfect opportunity to take him to task.

As far as the Republicans, all 4 of their Council members cannot launch another run because of term limits. Whether they'll openly admit it or not, all of them have probably eyed the Executive's seat at one time or another. And, with Leopold eligible for an additional 4 year stretch, many probably prematurely dismissed any chance of a 2010 campaign. Now, what do they have to lose? Many in the party are privately fuming at Leopold right now. Obviously, the religious right doesn't like the latest news. In other words, the waters are ripe for a primary challenge. Personally, I say watch Cathleen Vitale.

Historically however, no Councilperson has gone directly from that seat to the Executive's office. Typically, a member of the House or Senate steps up and emerges as the victor. No doubt, by 2014 many Republican legislators would have strongly considered the opportunity. In fact, word on the street says Steve Schuh has already planted a seed. While he would certainly be a formidable primary opponent next year against Leopold, their friendship is well documented. Of course, he may shoot himself in the foot by wasting his golden chance.

Of course, let's not discount the Democrats. They could benefit from a contentious primary or an anti-Leopold sentiment. That said, someone should be out there right now demanding an independent investigation. Anyway, the two big names being floated are Ron Bateman and Jamie Benoit. I hear Bateman has no interest whereas he's doing a job he loves. Likewise, Benoit denies interest but provides the independence, tenacity and toughness necessary for the job. Outside of those two, I truly believe an unknown could emerge much the same way we saw with Janet Owens.

In the coming months, take a close look at who becomes the vocal opposition to the County Executive. Keep in mind, that voice may come from either side of the aisle.

Where are Anne Arundel Democratic Candidates?


In a state of Maryland, Democrats have as close to absolute power as any political party in the entire nation. Over time, they have maintained their legislative super-majority with practically no interruption. While most of the membership hails from the big 3 of Baltimore City, Montgomery and Prince George's counties, Democrats have built on momentum from these jurisdictions to somehow snag seats in otherwise conservative districts.

Once upon a time, Democrats had strong hold in Anne Arundel County. Sure, they weren't as liberal as their counterparts from the DC suburbs. Still, they went to Annapolis will the full faith and trust of the voters that sent them there. All of a sudden though, it's likely the party quit fighting in this county.

In 2006, the Democrats failed to produce a challenger for two County Council seats. That's inexcusable. At the very least, throw out a up and comer for the experience. I highly doubt that absolutely no one in the entire District has any dream of running. Granted, it shouldn't come down to the last minute wondering who might run.

Looking ahead, anyone wishing to run in 2010 should already be working behind the scenes. Instead, there's no buzz about potential County Executive or District 30/ 31 Delegate candidates. Retaking any of these seats will require a lot of money combined with a grass roots effort. Waking up and declaring in July of 2010 will assuredly be a waste of time.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

What Happened at Annapolis Mall?


Here's what we know. On January 30, 2008, at 5:37 in the evening, a man calls 911 to report possible sexual activity going on in a black Chevrolet Impala. Turns out, the vehicle in question is owned by Anne Arundel County.

From the 911 tape, it appears that an Officer drives past the vehicle several times. He then nervously reports "I see it. It's the County Executive's vehicle". Shortly after making contact with the vehicle, the Officer returns with a transmission of "It's the County Executive himself in the backseat". Then, without any apparent investigation, the Officer abruptly calls off additional units and declares the 911 caller's accusations "unfounded".

Clearly, there's now some controversy surrounding the County Executive. Of course, I strongly believe in a subject's innocence until they are proven guilty. That said, the County Police failed to properly investigate this incident. By the police spokesman's own admission, their "officers only made contact with the County Executive." Why didn't the Officers at least question the other party inside the car? If I am not mistaken, that's standard police procedure when investigating an allegation such as this.

Leopold explained his presence in the parking lot by stating that he's a frequent patron of Nordstrom. Fair enough. Did he go into Nordstrom that evening? Did anyone see him? Does he usually park over by the bank when he goes into that store? Did the Grey Lexus next to his car belong to the female inside his vehicle? All of these are legitimate questions that any rookie Police Officer should have asked.

Naturally, the media now wants to ask these questions. Unfortunately, the normally outgoing and jovial County Executive doesn't wish to speak. Today, he told the Capital "I don't want to talk about this. I'll answer your questions later at another time. If I think it's necessary," He then hung up on them.

I doubt this story will go away anytime soon. The public tends to be very forgiving when people level with us. Again, I don't believe the County Executive should be crucified before he's tried. By the same token, ignoring it won't make it disappear either.

Monday, February 09, 2009

County Police Shouldn't Be Raising State Revenue


This morning, I read the Anne Arundel County Police press releases. On Friday, the department apparently ran a "targeted traffic enforcement" along the Ft Smallwood Rd corridor. Thinking back, I recall an unusually high number of people pulled over in this area over this weekend. For the record, I have no issue with local police addressing obvious nuisances on the highway. Still, I think the county bears no obligation to arbitrary concentrate on traffic violators.

Anyone who reads the paper realizes that local counties will receive substantially less aid from the state this year. Considering all the money generated from traffic citations goes directly to the State of Maryland, why should County Police put forth extra effort into something they'll derive little benefit from?

Certainly, police resources can be better utilized driving through neighborhoods as opposed to securing good hiding spots along Ft Smallwood Rd. Perhaps the increased police presence in local communities would curb crimes such as burglary and robbery. No doubt, such an effort would go a long way in deterring gangs and other undesirables from loitering on our streets.

Once again, I am not against County Police conducting traffic stops. In fact, I recognize these stops often lead to bigger finds. That being said, making traffic stops a primary focus of local police work limits the overall productivity of the force.

Sunday, February 08, 2009

More Anne Arundel Government High Rollers




Listed below are 24 additional people who made over $100,000 working for Anne Arundel County last year. The top two on the list took nominal pay cuts from 2007. Specifically, Mr. Leopold took home 32 cents less than he did the year prior. The remaining 22 cracked the $100K mark for this first time in 2008. Keep in mind, these 24 are additional to the 87 other county employees making over the century mark. Once again, I question the need of a county in supposed economic crisis to employ so many people at such high salaries.
Leopold, John, County Executive $124,999.68
Martin, William H Correctional Facility Admin. $106,953.60
Anderson, Daniel J Engineer Manager $100,285.12
Baker, Carol R Director of Aging/Disabilities $130,000.00
Bateman, Ronald S Sheriff $102,107.20
Burzenski, Stephen H Engineer Manager $102,388.00
Campbell, Leslie A Senior Budget Mgmt Analyst $100,106.24
Caporale, Lawrence J Assistant State's Attorney $101,060.96
Chaney Jr, William F Recreation Administrator $100,555.52
Duden, Nancy M Supervising County Attorney $113,345.44
Flemings, Jerard A. Police Captain $102,107.20
Glendenning, Craig J Asst County Auditor $111,161.44
Iliff, Sarah M. Senior Assistant Co Attorney $108,363.84
Jordan, Joseph E Police Captain $100,975.68
Krajcsik, Stephen J Solid Waste Disposal&Maint Mgr $101,000.64
Layton, Laura E Engineer Manager $100,890.40
Lord, Michael W Attorney III $100,199.84
Marzucco, Francis J Director Of Recreation & Parks $106,007.20
Pressley, David E Deputy Police Chief $112,575.84
Reilly, Eileen A Assistant State's Attorney $104,703.04
Rzepkowski, Thomas E Police Captain $102,107.20
Tom, Larry R Planning & Zoning Officer $129,804.48
Travers, Ronald J Attorney III $105,056.64
Wilson, Thomas J Police Captain $101,391.68

Anne Arundel County's Self-Created Fiscal Mess



When reading about impending furloughs for Anne Arundel County employees, I naturally wondered what could've happened in such a short period of time. After all, within the last couple of years, I have read about county labor unions receiving generous long term contracts and big wigs collecting huge raises on top of their already inflated salaries. Speaking of which, I count 87 people who received raises from 2007 to 2008 on top of their $100,000+ a year paychecks. Keep in mind, this is not even a complete list of county employees cracking the $100,000 mark. Below, I have listed the high rollers that got nice raises despite a looming economic crisis. Specifically, it lists their salaries in 2008 and the overall percentage increase from the year prior. To me, it seems we could save a lot of money by eliminating many of these "Assistants". Also, it seems we have multiple people holding the same title. At the very least, they should be the ones facing long term furloughs. Make no mistake, it's fiscal irresponsibility personified.



Busch, Michael E, Parks Administrator- $113,135.36(12.82%)
Callahan, Dennis M, CAO $161,175.04(8.17%)
Bowen, Ronald, Director of Public Works- $153,296.00-(7.40%)
Stokes, David L, Fire Chief, $135,214.56(8.17%)
Teare, James, Chief Of Police- $134,130.88(8.17%)
Dixon, Elizabeth, Inspections & Permits $129,804.48(8.17%)
Harting, Robin R, Detention Center Head- $124,396.48(8.17%)
Tyler, Hamilton, Assistant Co Attorney- $113,054.24(8.17%)
Schram, Frederick, Central Services Officer- $135,659.68(6.62%)
Weaver, Rhonda, Assistant Co Attorney- $110,907.68(8.17%)
Mirenzi, Matthew, Utilities Administrator $110,084.00(8.17%)
Strobel, Reinhold, Fire Deputy Chief $108,881.76(8.17%)
Murray, Andrew, Supervising Attorney $121,617.60(7.24%)
Kiessling, Laura, Deputy State's Attorney $115,325.60(7.14%)
Sweeney, Julie, Assistant Co Attorney $107,883.36(7.66%)
Blair, Lori, Senior Assistant Co Attorney $113,135.36(7.07%)
Kokolis, Terry, Correctional Administrator $110,316.96(7.14%)
Eberle, George, Inspections & Permits $109,605.60(7.14%)
Soldano, Christopher,Plan & Zoning Officer $109,512.00(7.14%)
Scholz, John, Fire Deputy Chief $113,830.08(6.74%)
Fulton, Andrea, Personnel Officer $135,659.68(5.16%)
Miles, Virginia,State's Attorney $109,616.00(6.42%)
Outing, Kevin, Senior Assistant Co Attorney $113,135.36(6.18%)
Davis, Warren, Assistant State's Attorney $110,231.68(6.10%)
Hannon, Robert,Programming Director $135,659.68(4.35%)
Fleming, Kenneth, Engineer Administrator $113,135.36(4.97%)
Phipps, Christopher, Public Works Deputy $128,001.12(4.37%)
Hodgson, Jonathan, County Attorney $153,296.00(3.58%)
Ryan, William, Info. Technology Officer $135,659.68(3.99%)
Dixon, Richard, Util Ops Administrator $113,135.36(4.09%)
O'Connor, John, Assistant Personnel Officer $113,135.36(3.97%)
Smith, Mettie, Attorney III $105,056.64(4.26%)
Lawrence, Charles, Assistant Dir. Of Aging $113,135.36(3.80%)
Weathersbee, Frank, State's Attorney $138,648.64(3.00%)
Brown, William, Controller $135,659.68(3.02%)
Hammond, John, Budget Officer $135,659.68-(3.02%)
Legendre, Stephen, Admin. Hearing Officer $135,659.68-(3.02%)
Sutherland, Teresa, County Auditor $135,659.68(3.02%)
Wright, Bruce, Engineer Administrator $113,135.36(3.61%)
Friedman, Alan, Legislative Liaison Officer $128,001.12(3.06%)
Davis, Emerson Deputy Police Chief $128,648.00(3.02%)
Africa, Gregorio, Deputy Dir. Public Works, $128,001.12(3.02%)
Bonk, Michael, Deputy Dir. Public Works $128,001.12(3.02%)
Loomis, Robert, Assistant Dir. Public Works $128,001.12(3.02%)
Pittman, James, Deputy Dir. Public Works $128,001.12(3.02%)
Plymyer, David, Deputy County Attorney $128,001.12(3.02%)
Roessler, William, Deputy State's Attorney $124,783.36(3.00%)
Burford, Marc, Budget Mgmt. Analyst $105,056.64(3.52%)
Dickinson, Joanna, Assistant Controller $121,617.60(3.02%)
Ferris, Cynthia, Master Circuit Court $121,617.60(3.02%)
Muskin, Charles, Master Circuit Court $121,617.60(3.02%)
Powers, Susan, Asst County Auditor $121,617.60(3.02%)
Shomberg, Helen, Assistant Controller $121,617.60(3.02%)
Svendsen, Kurt, Assistant Budget Officer $121,617.60(3.02%)
Wallace, Robert, Court Administrator $121,617.60(3.02%)
Wolfe, Erica, Master Circuit Court $121,617.60(3.02%)
Ray, John, Fire Deputy Chief $113,830.08(3.02%)
Balentine, Jeffrey, Asst Dir. Of Aging $113,135.36(3.02%)
Currier, Linda, Solid Waste Operations $113,135.36(3.02%)
Holmes, Judy, County CouncilAdmin- $113,135.36(3.02%)
Hopkins, Patricia, Asst Personnel Officer $113,135.36(3.02%)
Leib, Robert, Asst To The County Executive $113,135.36(3.02%)
Lesher, Paul, Util Ops Administrator $113,135.36(3.02%)
Neugebauer, Ronald, Util Ops Administrator $113,135.36(3.02%)
Schull, William, Purchasing Agent $113,135.36(3.02%)
Sophocleus, Theodore, Asst To State's Atty $113,135.36(3.02%)
Ward, Frank, Asst Director Inspect & Permit $113,135.36(3.02%)
Bergeson, Michael, Asst. State's Attorney $110,918.08(3.00%)
Katcef, William, Asst State's Attorney $110,918.08(3.00%)
Kiessling Trevor, Asst State's Attorney $110,918.08(3.00%)
Ragione, Frank, Asst State's Attorney $110,918.08(3.00%)
Bryant, William, Code Enforce Admin. $105,056.64(3.02%)
Burkhardt, Douglas, Engineer Manager $105,056.64(3.02%)
Candelaria, Ivan, Engineer Manager $105,056.64(3.02%)
Cardwell, George, Planning Administrator $105,056.64(3.02%)
Carter, Vanessa, Dir. Public Health Progms $105,056.64(3.02%)
Dehoff, William, Telecommunication Chief $105,056.64(3.02%)
Farrell, Henry, Budget Mgmt Analyst $105,056.64(3.02%)
Gaulke, Caroline, Engineer Manager $105,056.64(3.02%)
Greksa, Wayne, Senior Budget Mgmt Analyst $105,056.64(3.02%)
Hockstra, Darryl, Engineer Manager $105,056.64(3.02%)
Holthaus, Rhody, Road Operations Cheif $105,056.64(3.02%)
Kane, Daniel, Project Development Admin. $105,056.64 (3.02%)
Klingelhoefer-Ellis, Ginger, Planning Admin $105,056.64(3.02%)
Peacock, John, Code Enforce Admin $105,056.64 (3.02%)
Schroll, James, Engineer Manager $105,056.64(3.02%)
Taylor, John, Chief, Data Resources $105,056.64(3.02%)